Articles / Before you buy

How to tell your staff you are automating part of their job

About 52% of U.S. workers say they are worried about the future of AI in their workplace, in a Pew Research Center survey of 5,273 employed adults. That is the room you walk into when you tell your office manager a phone agent will take the first ring. Most owners handle this talk badly, or skip it. Here is how to do it in plain words, with numbers behind each step.

By Alex Yeskolski, Founder, VuseDesk. 1,362 words, about 7 min at 200 words a minute, 8 sources, 1 table.

Tell them before you install it

If they hear it from the machine first, you have already lost them.

Most companies bring in the tool and never explain the plan. Gallup, in its panel of U.S. employees, found 47% say their employer has integrated AI tools, but only 25% say they were given a clear plan for it. That gap is where rumors grow. Only 36% of employees in the same Gallup panel strongly agree their manager supports the team using AI.

Consulting staff first is rare, even at big firms. The OECD surveyed 2,053 employers in finance and manufacturing across 7 countries and found 43% of finance employers and 45% of manufacturing employers talked to workers before adopting AI. The same OECD study found workers who were consulted were more likely to report gains in productivity and working conditions. That is a link, not proof of cause, but it points the right way.

Check the workload claim first

Do not promise the tool will cut work until you have watched it cut work.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia announced 45 customer service cuts, saying a voice bot had lowered call volumes, according to ABC News in Australia. Call volumes then rose, the bank had to offer overtime and put team leaders on phones, and it reversed the cuts and apologized. The bank said it had not adequately considered all relevant business considerations. That is a forecast failure as much as a communication failure.

Klarna is the other case people cite, and I could only confirm it secondhand. CX Dive reported that Klarna had claimed its assistant did the work of 700 agents, then resumed hiring humans after its CEO said cost had been too dominant a factor and quality suffered. Treat the 700 figure as Klarna's own claim. The lesson is the same either way. Run the tool for a stretch, count the calls it really handled, and then announce what it does.

Name the tasks, not the jobs

Say which tasks move to the tool, and say out loud which ones do not.

The honest story at most small firms is not layoffs. In the New York Fed's Regional Business Survey of service firms in New York and Northern New Jersey, only 1% of firms using AI had laid anyone off because of it in the prior 6 months. In that same survey, 12% had reduced hiring, 13% expected layoffs in the next 6 months, and just over 33% had retrained existing staff. Among manufacturers in the same survey, 0% had laid anyone off and 14% had retrained.

So the words to use are retrain and reassign, because that is what most firms do. Nearly 50% of both service firms and manufacturers in the New York Fed survey expected to retrain workers in the next 6 months. The tool is also no longer rare. The same survey found 40% of service firms using AI, up from 25% the prior year, and 26% of manufacturers, up from 16%.

What workers hear

The numbers below are what workers say and what employers actually did.

MeasureNumberWho measured it
Workers worried about AI at work52%Pew Research Center, 5,273 employed U.S. adults
Workers expecting fewer opportunities for themselves32%Pew Research Center, same survey
Employers that consulted staff before adopting AI43% to 45%OECD, 2,053 employers in finance and manufacturing
Employees told a clear AI plan by their employer25%Gallup Panel, U.S. employees
Employers that have integrated AI tools47%Gallup Panel, U.S. employees
AI using service firms that laid anyone off1%New York Fed Regional Business Survey
AI using service firms that retrained staffjust over 33%New York Fed Regional Business Survey
Federal notice owed for 50 or more cut at one site by a 100 plus employer60 daysU.S. Department of Labor, WARN Act summary

Train them on it

Most of your staff have barely touched these tools, so show them.

Do not assume the crew already knows the software. Pew found only 16% of U.S. workers use AI in their own work at least some of the time, and 63% use it little or not at all, in its survey of 5,273 employed adults. Gallup's panel puts frequent use higher, at 30% a few times a week or more, with 15% using it daily. Either way, most of the room is new to it.

Training changes how people feel about the tool. The OECD found more than half of AI using workers got employer provided or employer funded training, and trained users were significantly more likely to report positive outcomes. Sit the dispatcher next to the phone agent for a week. Let her hear it fail and hear it fix a booking. Then ask her what it gets wrong.

Know what notice you owe

For most small shops, notice is a choice, not a law.

The federal WARN Act, as the U.S. Department of Labor summarizes it, requires 60 calendar days of written notice only from employers with 100 or more employees, and only before a plant closing or mass layoff hitting 50 or more workers at one site. The Department of Labor also notes the count leaves out workers with under 6 months on the job or averaging under 20 hours a week. If you run a 12 person plumbing outfit, the law does not require any notice. Giving it anyway is how you keep the 11 who stay.

Some states set lower bars. A State Chambers summary claims New York requires 90 days of notice from employers with 50 or more employees and California covers employers with 75 or more, but I did not open the statutes, so check them before you rely on that. One more number to keep in mind. The OECD found 57% of workers want AI banned from firing decisions and 40% want it banned from hiring, so tell them plainly that a person, not the tool, makes those calls.

What stays human

The tool takes the task. The person keeps the judgment.

The agent answers the ring and books the slot. Your office manager still decides which customer gets the Friday spot when 2 of them want it. The agent logs a payment record, and VuseDesk records payments but never processes or moves money, so a human still handles the deposit. Workers are split on this shift. Pew found 36% of U.S. workers feel hopeful about AI at work and 33% feel overwhelmed, in the same survey of 5,273 adults. Your job in the meeting is to move people from the second group to the first.

What we got wrong

I went in assuming a scared room, and the numbers say it is calmer than that.

The OECD surveyed 5,334 workers and found only 19% in finance and 14% in manufacturing were very or extremely worried about losing their job to AI within 10 years, while 46% and 50% were not worried at all. I also assumed the announcement was about cuts, but the New York Fed's 1% layoff figure among AI using service firms says the real story is retraining. The Commonwealth Bank case taught me the failure was a wrong forecast, not just bad wording. And I assumed a notice law applied, when the U.S. Department of Labor's 100 employee and 50 affected thresholds mean it usually does not.

Have us look at it first

If you would rather not guess which tasks the tool can really hold, book the VuseDesk audit. We walk your phones, your schedule and your invoices, and we tell you what to automate, what to leave alone and what to say to your staff. Then you decide.

Alex Yeskolski Founder, VuseDesk. He writes the software these articles describe. More about the author
Walk the tour before you decide

Or call (252) 666-7217 and ask the 1 question this article did not answer. Email [email protected] if you would rather write it down.